Paper detail

Measurement of the Lifetime Difference of $B_d$ Mesons: Possible and Worthwhile?

We estimate the decay width difference $ΔGamma_d / Γ_d$ in the $B_d$ system including $1/m_b$ contributions and next-to-leading order QCD corrections, and find it to be around 0.3%. We explicitly show that the time measurements of an untagged $B_d$ decaying to a single final state isotropically can only be sensitive to quadratic terms in $ΔGamma_d / Γ_d$, and hence the use of at least two different final states is desired. We discuss such pairs of candidate decay channels for the final states and explore the feasibility of a $ΔGamma_d / Γ_d$ measurement through them. The measurement of this width difference is essential for an accurate measurement of $\sin(2β)$ at the LHC. The nonzero width difference may also be used to identify new physics effects and to resolve a twofold discrete ambiguity in the $B_d$-$\bar{B}_d$ mixing phase. We also derive an upper bound on the value of $ΔGamma_d / Γ_d$ in the presence of new physics, and point out some differences in the phenomenology of width differences in the $B_s$ and $B_d$ systems.

preprint2001arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.