Paper detail

Mean-Field Theories for Depinning and their Experimental Signatures

Mean-field theory is an approximation replacing an extended system by a few variables. For depinning of elastic manifolds, these are the position of its center of mass $u$, and the statistics of the forces $F(u)$. There are two proposals to model the latter: as a random walk (ABBM model), or as uncorrelated forces at integer $u$ (discretized particle model, DPM). While for many experiments ABBM (in the literature misleadingly equated with mean-field theory) makes quantitatively correct predictions, the microscopic disorder force-force correlations cannot grow linearly, and thus unboundedly as a random walk. Even the effective (renormalized) disorder forces which do so at small distances are bounded at large distances. We propose to model forces as an Ornstein Uhlenbeck process. The latter behaves as a random walk at small scales, and is uncorrelated at large ones. By connecting to results in both limits, we solve the model largely analytically, allowing us to describe in all regimes the distributions of velocity, avalanche size and duration. To establish experimental signatures of this transition, we study the response function, and the correlation function of position $u$, velocity $\dot u$ and forces $F$ under slow driving with velocity $v>0$. While at $v=0$ force or position correlations have a cusp at the origin, this cusp is rounded at a finite driving velocity. We give a detailed analytic analysis for this rounding by velocity, which allows us, given experimental data, to extract the time-scale of the response function, and to reconstruct the force-force correlator at $v=0$. The latter is the central object of the field theory, and as such contains detailed information about the universality class in question. We test our predictions by careful numerical simulations extending over up to ten orders in magnitude.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.