Paper detail

Mean-Field Solution of the Weak-Strong Cluster Problem for Quantum Annealing with Stoquastic and Non-Stoquastic Catalysts

We study the weak-strong cluster problem for quantum annealing in its mean-field version as proposed by Albash [Phys. Rev. A 99 (2019) 042334] who showed by numerical diagonalization that non-stoquastic $XX$ interactions (non-stoquastic catalysts) remove the problematic first-order phase transition. We solve the problem exactly in the thermodynamic limit by analytical methods and show that the removal of the first-order transition is successfully achieved either by stoquastic or non-stoquastic $XX$ interactions depending on whether the $XX$ interactions are introduced within the weak cluster, within the strong cluster, or between them. We also investigate the case where the interactions between the two clusters are sparse, i.e. not of the mean-field all-to-all type. The results again depend on where to introduce the $XX$ interactions. We further analyze how inhomogeneous driving of the transverse field affects the performance of the system without $XX$ interactions and find that inhomogeneity in the transverse field removes the first-order transition if appropriately implemented.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.