Paper detail

MCMARL: Parameterizing Value Function via Mixture of Categorical Distributions for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

In cooperative multi-agent tasks, a team of agents jointly interact with an environment by taking actions, receiving a team reward and observing the next state. During the interactions, the uncertainty of environment and reward will inevitably induce stochasticity in the long-term returns and the randomness can be exacerbated with the increasing number of agents. However, such randomness is ignored by most of the existing value-based multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) methods, which only model the expectation of Q-value for both individual agents and the team. Compared to using the expectations of the long-term returns, it is preferable to directly model the stochasticity by estimating the returns through distributions. With this motivation, this work proposes a novel value-based MARL framework from a distributional perspective, \emph{i.e.}, parameterizing value function via \underline{M}ixture of \underline{C}ategorical distributions for MARL. Specifically, we model both individual Q-values and global Q-value with categorical distribution. To integrate categorical distributions, we define five basic operations on the distribution, which allow the generalization of expected value function factorization methods (\emph{e.g.}, VDN and QMIX) to their MCMARL variants. We further prove that our MCMARL framework satisfies \emph{Distributional-Individual-Global-Max} (DIGM) principle with respect to the expectation of distribution, which guarantees the consistency between joint and individual greedy action selections in the global Q-value and individual Q-values. Empirically, we evaluate MCMARL on both a stochastic matrix game and a challenging set of StarCraft II micromanagement tasks, showing the efficacy of our framework.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.