Paper detail

Maximum mass of neutron stars and strange neutron-star cores

Recent measurement of mass of PSR J1614-2230 rules out most of existing models of equation of state (EOS) of dense matter with high-density softening due to hyperonization, based on the recent hyperon-nucleon and hyperon-hyperon interactions, leading to a "hyperon puzzle". We study a specific solution of "hyperon puzzle", consisting in replacing a too soft hyperon core by a sufficiently stiff quark core. We construct an analytic approximation fitting very well modern EOSs of 2SC and CFL color superconducting phases of quark matter. This allows us for simulating continua of sequences of first-order phase transitions from hadronic matter to the 2SC, and then to the CFL state of color superconducting quark matter. We obtain constraints in the parameter space of the EOS of superconducting quark cores, resulting from M_max> 2 M_sol. We also derive constraints that would result from significantly higher measured masses. For 2.4 M_sol required stiffness of the CFL quark core should have been close to the causality limit, the density jump at the phase transition being very small. Condition M_max > 2 M_sol puts strong constraints on the EOSs of the 2SC and CFL phases of quark matter. Density jumps at the phase transitions have to be sufficiently small and sound speeds in quark matter - sufficiently large. A strict condition of thermodynamic stability of quark phase results in the maximum mass of hybrid stars similar to that of purely baryon stars. Therefore, to get M_max>2 M_sol for stable hybrid stars, both sufficiently strong additional hyperon repulsion at high density baryon matter and a sufficiently stiff EOS of quark matter would be needed. However, it is likely that the high density instability of quark matter (reconfinement) indicates actually the inadequacy of the point-particle model of baryons in dense matter at very high densities.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.