Paper detail

Maximum likelihood estimators uniformly minimize distribution variance among distribution unbiased estimators in exponential families

We employ a parameter-free distribution estimation framework where estimators are random distributions and utilize the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence as a loss function. Wu and Vos [J. Statist. Plann. Inference 142 (2012) 1525-1536] show that when an estimator obtained from an i.i.d. sample is viewed as a random distribution, the KL risk of the estimator decomposes in a fashion parallel to the mean squared error decomposition when the estimator is a real-valued random variable. In this paper, we explore how conditional versions of distribution expectation ($E^{\dagger}$) can be defined so that a distribution version of the Rao-Blackwell theorem holds. We define distributional expectation and variance ($V^{\dagger}$) that also provide a decomposition of KL risk in exponential and mixture families. For exponential families, we show that the maximum likelihood estimator (viewed as a random distribution) is distribution unbiased and is the unique uniformly minimum distribution variance unbiased (UMV$^{\dagger}$U) estimator. Furthermore, we show that the MLE is robust against model specification in that if the true distribution does not belong to the exponential family, the MLE is UMV$^{\dagger}$U for the KL projection of the true distribution onto the exponential families provided these two distribution have the same expectation for the canonical statistic. To allow for estimators taking values outside of the exponential family, we include results for KL projection and define an extended projection to accommodate the non-existence of the MLE for families having discrete sample space. Illustrative examples are provided.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.