Paper detail

Maximum Entropy Principle, Equal Probability a Priori and Gibbs Paradox

We prove that information-theoretic maximum entropy (MaxEnt) approach to canonical ensemble is mathematically equivalent to the classic approach of Boltzmann, Gibbs and Darwin-Fowler. The two approaches, however, "interpret" a same mathematical theorem differently; most notably observing mean-energy in the former and energy conservation in the latter. However, applying the same MaxEnt method to grand canonical ensemble fails; while carefully following the classic approach based on Boltzmann's microcanonical {\em equal probability a priori} produces the correct statistics: One does not need to invoke quantum mechanics; and there is no Gibbs paradox. MaxEnt and related minimum relative entropy principle are based on the mathematical theorem concerning large deviations of rare fluctuations. As a scientific method, it requires classic mechanics, or some other assumptions, to provide meaningful {\em prior distributions} for the expected-value based statistical inference. A naive assumption of uniform prior is not valid in statistical mechanics.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.