Paper detail

Maximum and Minimum Stable Random Packings of Platonic Solids

Motivated by the relation between particle shape and packing, we measure the volume fraction $ϕ$ occupied by the Platonic solids which are a class of polyhedron with congruent sides, vertices and dihedral angles. Tetrahedron, cube, octahedron, dodecahedron, and icosahedron shaped plastic dice were fluidized or mechanically vibrated to find stable random loose packing $ϕ_{rlp} = 0.51, 0.54, 0.52, 0.51, 0.50$ and densest packing $ϕ_{rcp} = 0.64, 0.67, 0.64, 0.63, 0.59$, respectively with standard deviation $\simeq \pm 0.01$. We find that $ϕ$ obtained by all protocols peak at the cube, which is the only Platonic solid that can tessellate space, and then monotonically decrease with number of sides. This overall trend is similar but systematically lower than the maximum $ϕ$ reported for frictionless Platonic solids, and below $ϕ_{rlp}$ of spheres for the loose packings. Experiments with ceramic tetrahedron were also conducted, and higher friction was observed to lead to lower $ϕ$.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.