Paper detail

Maximizing the Spread of Stable Influence: Leveraging Norm-driven Moral-Motivation for Green Behavior Change in Networks

In an effort to understand why individuals choose to participate in personally-expensive pro-environmental behaviors, environmental and behavioral economists have examined a moral-motivation model in which the decision to adopt a pro-environmental behavior depends on the society-wide market share of that behavior. An increasing body of practical research on adoption of pro-environmental behavior emphasizes the importance of encouragement from local social contacts and messaging about locally-embraced norms: we respond by extending the moral-motivation model to a social networks setting. We obtain a new decision rule: an individual adopts a pro-environmental behavior if he or she observes a certain threshold of adoption within their local social neighborhood. This gives rise to a concurrent update process which describes adoption of a pro-environmental behavior spreading through a network. The original moral-motivation model corresponds to the special case of our network version in a complete graph. By improving convergence results, we formulate modest-size Integer Programs that accurately (but not efficiently) find minimum-size sets of nodes that convert the entire network, or alternately that maximize long-term adoption in the network given a limited number of nodes which may be temporarily converted. Issues of stability in determining long-term adoption are key. We give hardness of approximation results for these optimization problems. We demonstrate that there exist classes of networks which qualitatively have severely different behavior than the non-networked version, and provide preliminary computational results in in modestly-sized highly-clustered small-world networks related to the famous small-world networks of Watts and Strogatz.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.