Paper detail

Maximizing Secrecy Rate of an OFDM-based Multi-hop Underwater Acoustic Sensor Network

In this paper, we consider an eavesdropping attack on a multi-hop, UnderWater Acoustic Sensor Network (UWASN) that consists of $M+1$ underwater sensors which report their sensed data via Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) scheme to a sink node on the water surface. Furthermore, due to the presence of a passive malicious node in nearby vicinity, the multi-hop UnderWater Acoustic (UWA) channel between a sensor node and the sink node is prone to eavesdropping attack on each hop. Therefore, the problem at hand is to do (helper/relay) node selection (for data forwarding onto the next hop) as well as power allocation (across the OFDM sub-carriers) in a way that the secrecy rate is maximized at each hop. To this end, this problem of Node Selection and Power Allocation (NSPA) is formulated as a mixed binary-integer optimization program, which is then optimally solved via decomposition approach, and by exploiting duality theory along with the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker conditions. We also provide a computationally-efficient, sub-optimal solution to the NSPA problem, where we reformulate it as a mixed-integer linear program and solve it via decomposition and geometric approach. Moreover, when the UWA channel is multipath (and not just line-of-sight), we investigate an additional, machine learning-based approach to solve the NSPA problem. Finally, we compute the computational complexity of all the three proposed schemes (optimal, sub-optimal, and learning-based), and do extensive simulations to compare their performance against each other and against the baseline schemes (which allocate equal power to all the sub-carriers and do depth-based node selection). In a nutshell, this work proposes various (optimal and sub-optimal) methods for providing information-theoretic security at the physical layer of the protocol stack through resource allocation.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.