Paper detail

Matter Power Spectra in Viable $f(R)$ Gravity Models with Massive Neutrinos

We investigate the matter power spectra in the power law and exponential types of viable $f(R)$ theories along with massive neutrinos. The enhancement of the matter power spectrum is found to be a generic feature in these models. In particular, we show that in the former type, such as the Starobinsky model, the spectrum is magnified much larger than the latter one, such as the exponential model. A greater scale of the total neutrino mass, $Σm_ν$, is allowed in the viable $f(R)$ models than that in the $Λ$CDM one. We obtain the constraints on the neutrino masses by using the CosmoMC package with the modified MGCAMB. Explicitly, we get $Σm_ν < 0.451 \ (0.214)\ \mathrm{eV}$ at 95% C.L. in the Starobinsky (exponential) model, while the corresponding one for the $Λ$CDM model is $Σm_ν < 0.200\ \mathrm{eV}$. Furthermore, by treating the effective number of neutrino species $N_{\mathrm{eff}}$ as a free parameter along with $Σm_ν$, we find that $N_{\mathrm{eff}} = 3.78^{+0.64}_{-0.84} (3.47^{+0.74}_{-0.60})$ and $Σm_ν = 0.533^{+0.254}_{-0.411}$ ($< 0.386) \ \mathrm{eV}$ at 95% C.L. in the Starobinsky (exponential) model.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.