Paper detail

Mathematical study of linear morphodynamic acceleration and derivation of the MASSPEED approach

Morphological accelerators, such as the MORFAC (MORphological acceleration FACtor) approach, are widely adopted techniques for the acceleration of the bed evolution, which reduces the computational cost of morphodynamic numerical simulations. In this work we apply a non-uniform acceleration to the one-dimensional morphodynamic problem described by the de Saint Venant-Exner model by multiplying all the spatial derivatives by an individual constant (>1) acceleration factor. The final goal is to identify the best combination of the three accelerating factors for which i) the bed responds linearly to hydrodynamic changes; ii) a consistent decrease of the computational cost is obtained. The sought combination is obtained by studying the behaviour of an approximate solution of the three eigenvalues associated with the flux matrix of the accelerated system. This approach allows to derive a new linear morphodynamic acceleration technique, the MASSPEED (MASs equations SPEEDup) approach, and the a priori determination of the highest acceleration allowed for a given simulation. In this new approach both mass conservation equations (water and sediment) are accelerated by the same factor, differently from the MORFAC approach where only the sediment mass equation is modified. The analysis shows that the MASSPEED gives a larger validity range for linear acceleration and requires smaller computational costs than that of the classical MORFAC approach. The MASSPEED approach is implemented within an example code, using an adaptive approach that applies the maximum linear acceleration similarly to the Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy stability condition. Finally, numerical simulations have been performed in order to assess the accuracy and efficiency of the new approach. Results obtained in the long-term propagation of a sediment hump demonstrate the advantages of the new approach.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.