Paper detail

$\mathbb{Z}_2^n$-Supergeometry II: Batchelor-Gawedzki Theorem

Quite a number of $\mathbb{Z}_2^n$-gradings, $n\geq 2$, appear in Physics and in Mathematics. The corresponding sign rules are given by the `scalar product' of the involved $\mathbb{Z}_2^n$-degrees. The new theory exhibits challenging differences with the classical one: nonzero degree even coordinates are not nilpotent, and even (resp., odd) coordinates do not necessarily commute (resp., anticommute) pairwise (the parity is the parity of the total degree). Formal series are the appropriate substitute for nilpotency; the category of $\mathbb{Z}_2^\bullet$-manifolds is closed with respect to the tangent and cotangent functors. The $\mathbb{Z}_2^n$-supergeometric viewpoint provides deeper insight and simplified solutions; interesting relations with Quantum Field Theory and Quantum Mechanics are expected. In this article, we introduce split $\mathbb{Z}_2^n$-manifolds as intrinsic superizations of $\mathbb{Z}_2^n\setminus\{0\}$-graded vector bundles and prove that, conversely, any $\mathbb{Z}_2^n$-manifold is noncanonically split. We thus provide a complete proof of the $\mathbb{Z}_2^n$-extension of the so-called Batchelor-Gawedzki Theorem.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors5 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.