Paper detail

Materials Transformers Language Models for Generative Materials Design: a benchmark study

Pre-trained transformer language models on large unlabeled corpus have produced state-of-the-art results in natural language processing, organic molecule design, and protein sequence generation. However, no such models have been applied to learn the composition patterns of inorganic materials. Here we train a series of seven modern transformer language models (GPT, GPT-2, GPT-Neo, GPT-J, BLMM, BART, and RoBERTa) using the expanded formulas from material deposited in the ICSD, OQMD, and Materials Projects databases. Six different datasets with/out non-charge-neutral or balanced electronegativity samples are used to benchmark the performances and uncover the generation biases of modern transformer models for the generative design of materials compositions. Our extensive experiments showed that the causal language models based materials transformers can generate chemically valid materials compositions with as high as 97.54\% to be charge neutral and 91.40\% to be electronegativity balanced, which has more than 6 times higher enrichment compared to a baseline pseudo-random sampling algorithm. These models also demonstrate high novelty and their potential in new materials discovery has been proved by their capability to recover the leave-out materials. We also find that the properties of the generated samples can be tailored by training the models with selected training sets such as high-bandgap materials. Our experiments also showed that different models each have their own preference in terms of the properties of the generated samples and their running time complexity varies a lot. We have applied our materials transformer models to discover a set of new materials as validated using DFT calculations.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.