Paper detail

Materials Swelling Revealed Through Automated Semantic Segmentation of Cavities in Electron Microscopy Images

Accurately quantifying swelling of alloys that have undergone irradiation is essential for understanding alloy performance in a nuclear reactor and critical for the safe and reliable operation of reactor facilities. However, typical practice is for radiation-induced defects in electron microscopy images of alloys to be manually quantified by domain-expert researchers. Here, we employ an end-to-end deep learning approach using the Mask Regional Convolutional Neural Network (Mask R-CNN) model to detect and quantify nanoscale cavities in irradiated alloys. We have assembled the largest database of labeled cavity images to date, which includes 400 images, >34k discrete cavities, and numerous alloy compositions and irradiation conditions. We have evaluated both statistical (precision, recall, and F1 scores) and materials property-centric (cavity size, density, and swelling) metrics of model performance, and performed in-depth analysis of materials swelling assessments. We find our model gives assessments of material swelling with an average (standard deviation) swelling mean absolute error based on random leave-out cross-validation of 0.30 (0.03) percent swelling. This result demonstrates our approach can accurately provide swelling metrics on a per-image and per-condition basis, which can provide helpful insight into material design (e.g., alloy refinement) and impact of service conditions (e.g., temperature, irradiation dose) on swelling. Finally, we find there are cases of test images with poor statistical metrics, but small errors in swelling, pointing to the need for moving beyond traditional classification-based metrics to evaluate object detection models in the context of materials domain applications.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.