Paper detail

Match-Prompt: Improving Multi-task Generalization Ability for Neural Text Matching via Prompt Learning

Text matching is a fundamental technique in both information retrieval and natural language processing. Text matching tasks share the same paradigm that determines the relationship between two given texts. The relationships vary from task to task, e.g.~relevance in document retrieval, semantic alignment in paraphrase identification and answerable judgment in question answering. However, the essential signals for text matching remain in a finite scope, i.e.~exact matching, semantic matching, and inference matching. Ideally, a good text matching model can learn to capture and aggregate these signals for different matching tasks to achieve competitive performance, while recent state-of-the-art text matching models, e.g.~Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs), are hard to generalize. It is because the end-to-end supervised learning on task-specific dataset makes model overemphasize the data sample bias and task-specific signals instead of the essential matching signals. To overcome this problem, we adopt a specialization-generalization training strategy and refer to it as Match-Prompt. In specialization stage, descriptions of different matching tasks are mapped to a few prompt tokens. In generalization stage, matching model explores the essential matching signals by being trained on diverse matching tasks. High diverse matching tasks avoid model fitting the data bias on a specific task, so that model can focus on learning the essential matching signals. Meanwhile, the prompt tokens obtained in the first step help the model distinguish different task-specific matching signals. Experimental results on public datasets show that Match-Prompt can improve multi-task generalization capability of PLMs in text matching and yield better in-domain multi-task, out-of-domain multi-task and new task adaptation performance than multi-task and task-specific models trained by previous fine-tuning paradigm.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.