Paper detail

Massively parallel solvers for elliptic PDEs in Numerical Weather- and Climate Prediction

The demand for substantial increases in the spatial resolution of global weather- and climate- prediction models makes it necessary to use numerically efficient and highly scalable algorithms to solve the equations of large scale atmospheric fluid dynamics. For stability and efficiency reasons several of the operational forecasting centres, in particular the Met Office and the ECMWF in the UK, use semi-implicit semi-Lagrangian time stepping in the dynamical core of the model. The additional burden with this approach is that a three dimensional elliptic partial differential equation (PDE) for the pressure correction has to be solved at every model time step and this often constitutes a significant proportion of the time spent in the dynamical core. To run within tight operational time scales the solver has to be parallelised and there seems to be a (perceived) misconception that elliptic solvers do not scale to large processor counts and hence implicit time stepping can not be used in very high resolution global models. After reviewing several methods for solving the elliptic PDE for the pressure correction and their application in atmospheric models we demonstrate the performance and very good scalability of Krylov subspace solvers and multigrid algorithms for a representative model equation with more than $10^{10}$ unknowns on 65536 cores on HECToR, the UK's national supercomputer. For this we tested and optimised solvers from two existing numerical libraries (DUNE and hypre) and implemented both a Conjugate Gradient solver and a geometric multigrid algorithm based on a tensor-product approach which exploits the strong vertical anisotropy of the discretised equation. We study both weak and strong scalability and compare the absolute solution times for all methods; in contrast to one-level methods the multigrid solver is robust with respect to parameter variations.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.