Paper detail

Masks Can Talk: Extracting Structured Text Information from Single-Modal Images for Remote Sensing Change Detection

Remote sensing change detection is pivotal for urban monitoring, disaster assessment, and environmental resource management. Yet, unimodal deep learning methods frequently confuse genuine semantic changes with visually similar but irrelevant variations. Recent multimodal approaches incorporate text as auxiliary supervision, but their descriptions are either semantically coarse and unstructured or model-generated and thus noisy. Critically, all of them overlook a simple fact: fine-grained change semantics are already implicitly encoded in the ground-truth mask labels that come standard with every change detection dataset. These masks know where the change happened, what the land-cover types were before and after, how the transition occurred, and how many objects were involved. In this paper, we propose S2M, a framework that obtains structured textual features directly from change labels at zero additional annotation cost. Specifically, each change region is automatically transcribed into a semantic quadruple (where, what, how, how many) and converted into several fixed-template text descriptions, providing precise, dense, and noise-free multimodal supervision. We adopts a two-stage training strategy to fine-tune on remote sensing imagery firstly for robust domain-specific representation, after which a multimodal decoder with a bi-directional contrastive loss is introduced to achieve deep alignment between visual features and structured textual embeddings. To validate our method, we construct Gaza-Change-v2, a new multi-class change detection (MCD) dataset about the Gaza Strip. On this MCD dataset, S2M achieves a Sek of 17.80\% and an F$_{\text{scd}}$ of 66.14\%, notably surpassing even multimodal methods that leverage large language models. Our work demonstrates that masks can indeed talk. They tell us exactly what, where, how, and how many changes have occurred.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.