Paper detail

Mapping cumulus clouds to scale invariant rough surfaces

Motivated by a recent observation on the self-organized criticality of cumulus clouds (Phys. Rev E 103, 052106, 2021) we study their connection to self-similar rough surfaces, in which $f\equiv \log I$ plays the role of the main field, where $I$ is the intensity of the received visible light. By simulating the light scattering based on a coarse-grained phenomenological model in a two-dimensional cloud, we argue the possible connection of $I$ to the actual cloud thickness. Although in the vertical incident light $f$ is proportional to the cloud thickness, in the general case it is complected. We study the statistical properties of observational data for $f$ with a focus on the conventional exponents of this scale-invariant rough surface. By calculating the roughness exponents, and comparing them with other exponents like the fractal dimension of loops, the distribution function of the radius of gyration and loop lengths, and the exponent of the green function, we prove that this surface is unconventional in the sense that it is the non-Gaussian self-affine random surface which violates the Kondev hyper-scaling relations.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.