Paper detail

Many-body effects in (p,pN) reactions within a unified approach

We study knockout reactions with proton probes within a theoretical framework where {\it ab initio} Quantum Monte Carlo wave functions are combined with the Faddeev/Alt-Grassberger-Sandhas few-body reaction formalism. New Quantum Monte Carlo wave functions are used to describe $^{12}$C, yielding, for the first time, results consistent with the experimental point rms radii, electron scattering data and (p,2p) total cross sections data. Our results for $\mathrm{A}\leq 12$ and $(N-Z) \leq 3$ nuclei show that the theoretical ratios between the (i) {\it ab initio} and Mean Field Approximation theoretical cross sections, $\mathcal{R}_σ$, (ii) corresponding ratios between the spectroscopic factors, $\mathcal{R}_Σ$, summed over states below particle emission, depend moderately on the nucleon separation energy S$_{\rm N}$. These ratios are determined by a delicate interplay between the radii of the parent and the residual nuclei and the nucleon separation energy, and were found to be always smaller for the knockout of the more correlated deficient species nucleon. In the case of the symmetric $^{12}$C nucleus, the theoretical ratios still appear to indicate that protons are more correlated than neutrons.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.