Paper detail

Many-body approximations to the superfluid gap and critical temperature in pure neutron matter

We compute singlet pairing gaps and critical temperatures in pure neutron matter with different many-body approximations. Medium effects tend to reduce gaps and critical temperatures compared to the standard BCS ansatz. In the mean-field approximation, the ratio of these two quantities remains constant across a wide range of densities. This constant ratio is close to the universal prediction of BCS theory, whether three-neutron interactions are included or not. Using a more sophisticated many-body approach that incorporates the effect of short-range correlations in pairing properties, we find that the gap to critical temperature ratio in the low-density regime is substantially larger than the BCS prediction, independently of the interaction. In this region, our results are relatively close to experiments and theoretical calculations from the unitary Fermi gas. We also find evidence for a different density dependence of zero-temperature gaps and critical temperatures in neutron matter.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.