Paper detail

Majority-vote model on (3,12^2), (4,6,12) and (4,8^2) Archimedean lattices

On ($3,12^2$), ($4,6,12$) and ($4,8^2$) Archimedean lattices, the critical properties of majority-vote model are considered and studied using the Glauber transition rate proposed by Kwak {\it et all.} [Phys. Rev. E, {\bf 75}, 061110 (2007)] rather than the traditional majority-vote with noise [José Mário de Oliveira, J. Stat. Phys. {\bf 66}, 273 (1992)]. The critical temperature and the critical exponents for this transition rate are obtained from extensive Monte Carlo simulations and with a finite size scaling analysis. The calculated values of the critical temperatures Binder cumulant are $T_c=0.363(2)$ and $U_4^*=0.577(4)$; $T_c=0.651(3)$ and $U_4^*=0.612(5)$; and $T_c=0.667(2)$ and $U_4^*=0.613(5)$ for ($3,12^2$), ($4,6,12$) and ($4,8^2$) lattices, respectively. The critical exponents $β/ν$, $γ/ν$ and $1/ν$ for this model are $0.237(6)$, $0.73(10)$, and $ 0.83(5)$; $0.105(8)$, $1.28(11)$, and $1.16(5)$; $0.113(2)$, $1.60(4)$, and $0.84(6)$ for ($3,12^2$), ($4,6,12$) and ($4,8^2$) lattices, respectively. These results differ from the usual Ising model results and the majority-vote model on so-far studied regular lattices or complex networks.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.