Paper detail

Magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy of Fe$(001)$, Fe$(110)$ slabs and nanoclusters: a detailed local analysis within a tight-binding model

We report tight-binding (TB) calculations of magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy (MAE) of Iron slabs and nanoclusters with a particuler focus on local analysis. After clarifying various concepts and formulations for the determination of MAE, we apply our realistic TB model to the analysis of the magnetic anisotropy of Fe$(001)$, Fe$(110)$ slabs and of two large Fe clusters with $(001)$ and $(110)$ facets only: a truncated pyramid and a truncated bipyramid containg 620 and 1096 atoms, respectively. It is shown that the MAE of slabs originates mainly from outer layers, a small contribution from the bulk gives rise, however, to an oscillatory behavior for large thicknesses. Interestingly, the MAE of the nanoclusters considered is almost solely due to $(001)$ facets and the base perimeter of the pyramid. We believe that this fact could be used to efficiently control the anisotropy of Iron nanoparticles and could also have consequences on their spin dynamics.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.