Paper detail

Magnetic states of iron-based superconducting compounds calculated by using GGA$+U$ method with negative \emph{U}

The magnetic moments per Fe atom in high-$T{_\textrm{c}}$ iron-based superconducting compounds, BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$ and LaFeAsO obtained from the first-principles calculation with local-spin-density approximation are much larger than those obtained from experiments. To resolve the contradictory results between theory and experiment we employed the so-called LDA$+ U$ (or more exactly GGA$+ U$) technique with negative \emph{U} in the first-principles calculation. The calculated values with negative \emph{U}, $- 0.09$ Ry and $- 0.10$ Ry for BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$ and LaFeAsO, respectively, are in excellent agreement with the experimental ones. By comparing the differences in \emph{d}-orbital occupation numbers and spin densities calculated by using a simple GGA and GGA$+ U$ with negative $U$, the magnetic moments of the two compounds are found to be similar to the case of low-spin state of metamagnetic Fe$_{3}$Al alloy.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.