Paper detail

Magnetic fluctuations and effective magnetic moments in γ-iron due to electronic structure peculiarities

Applying the local density and dynamical mean field approximations to paramagnetic γ-iron we revisit the problem of theoretical description of magnetic properties in a wide temperature range. We show that contrary to α-iron, the frequency dependence of the electronic self-energy has a quasiparticle form for both, t_{2g} and e_g states. In the temperature range T=1200-1500 K, where γ-iron exist in nature, this substance can be nevertheless characterized by temperature-dependent effective local moments, which yield relatively narrow peaks in the real part of the local magnetic susceptibility. At the same time, at low temperatures γ-iron (which is realized in precipitates) is better described in terms of itinerant picture. In particular, the nesting features of the Fermi surfaces yield maximum of the static magnetic susceptibility at the incommensurate wave vector q_{max} belonging the direction q_X-q_W (q_X=(2π/a)(1,0,0),q_W=(2π/a)(1,1/2,0), a is a lattice parameter) in agreement with the experimental data. This state is found however to compete closely with the states characterized by magnetic wave vectors along the directions q_X-q_L-q_K, where q_L=(2π/a)(1/2,1/2,1/2), q_K=(2π/a)(3/4,3/4,0). From the analysis of the uniform magnetic susceptibility we find that contrary to α-iron, the Curie-Weiss law is not fulfilled in a broad temperature range, although the inverse susceptibility is nearly linear in the moderate-temperature region (1200-1500 K). The non-linearity of the inverse uniform magnetic susceptibility in a broader temperature range is due to the density of states peak located close to the Fermi level. The effective exchange integrals in the paramagnetic phase are estimated on the base of momentum dependent susceptibility.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.