Paper detail

Magnetic field-induced anisotropic interaction in heavy quark bound states

We have investigated how a strong magnetic field (B) could decipher the anisotropic interaction in heavy quark ($Q$) and antiquark ($\bar Q$) bound states through the perturbative thermal QCD in real-time formalism. So we thermalize Schwinger propagator for quarks in LLL and the Feynman propagator for gluons to calculate the gluon self-energy. For the quark-loop contribution to the self-energy, the medium does not have any temperature correction and the vacuum term gives rise an anisotropic term whereas the gluon-loop yields temperature correction. This finding in quark-loop contribution corroborates the equivalence of a massless QED in (1+1)-dimension with the massless thermal QCD in strong B, which (quark sector) is reduced to (1+1)-dimension (longitudinal). Thus the permittivity of the medium behaves like as a tensor. Thus the permittivity of medium makes the $Q \bar Q$ potential anisotropic, which resembles with a contemporary results found in lattice studies. As a result, potential for $Q \bar Q$-pairs aligned transverse to B is more attractive than parallel alignment. However, potential is always more attractive compared to B=0 due to softening of screening mass. However, the imaginary-part of potential becomes smaller compared to B=0. We have next investigated the effects of strong ${\bf B}$ on binding energies (B.E.) and thermal widths ($Γ$) of ground states of $c \bar c$ and $b \bar b$ in a time-independent perturbation theory, where binding energies gets increased and widths gets decreased, compared to $B =0$. Finally we have studied the quasi-free dissociation of bound states in a strong B. The dissociation temperatures estimated for $J/ψ$ and $Υ$ states are obtained as $1.59 \rm{T_c} $ and $2.22 \rm{T_c}$, respectively, which are higher than the estimate in B=0 , thus preventing early dissolution of $Q \bar Q$ bound states.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.