Paper detail

Machine learning on DNA-encoded library count data using an uncertainty-aware probabilistic loss function

DNA-encoded library (DEL) screening and quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling are two techniques used in drug discovery to find small molecules that bind a protein target. Applying QSAR modeling to DEL data can facilitate the selection of compounds for off-DNA synthesis and evaluation. Such a combined approach has been shown recently by training binary classifiers to learn DEL enrichments of aggregated "disynthons" to accommodate the sparse and noisy nature of DEL data. However, a binary classifier cannot distinguish between different levels of enrichment, and information is potentially lost during disynthon aggregation. Here, we demonstrate a regression approach to learning DEL enrichments of individual molecules using a custom negative log-likelihood loss function that effectively denoises DEL data and introduces opportunities for visualization of learned structure-activity relationships (SAR). Our approach explicitly models the Poisson statistics of the sequencing process used in the DEL experimental workflow under a frequentist view. We illustrate this approach on a dataset of 108k compounds screened against CAIX, and a dataset of 5.7M compounds screened against sEH and SIRT2. Due to the treatment of uncertainty in the data through the negative log-likelihood loss function, the models can ignore low-confidence outliers. While our approach does not demonstrate a benefit for extrapolation to novel structures, we expect our denoising and visualization pipeline to be useful in identifying SAR trends and enriched pharmacophores in DEL data. Further, this approach to uncertainty-aware regression is applicable to other sparse or noisy datasets where the nature of stochasticity is known or can be modeled; in particular, the Poisson enrichment ratio metric we use can apply to other settings that compare sequencing count data between two experimental conditions.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.