Paper detail

M1 resonance in $^{208}$Pb within the self-consistent phonon-coupling model

The main goal of the paper is to investigate theoretically the experimentally observed fragmentation of the isovector $M1$ resonance in $^{208}$Pb within a self-consistent model based on an energy-density functional (EDF) of the Skyrme type. This fragmentation (spread of the $M1$ strength) is not reproduced in a conventional one-particle--one-hole ($1p1h$) random-phase approximation (RPA) and thus has to be investigated in the framework of more complicated models. However, previously applied models of this type were not self-consistent. In the present work, we use a recently developed renormalized version of the self-consistent time blocking approximation (RenTBA) in which the $1p1h\otimes$phonon configurations are included on top of the RPA $1p1h$ configurations. We have determined several sets of the parameters of the modified Skyrme EDF fitted within the RenTBA and RPA and have found the necessary condition of producing the fragmentation of the $M1$ resonance in $^{208}$Pb in our model. We present also the results of the RenTBA and RPA calculations for the first excited states of the natural parity modes in $^{208}$Pb obtained with these modified parametrizations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.