Paper detail

Luzzu Quality Metric Language -- A DSL for Linked Data Quality Assessment

The steadily growing number of linked open datasets brought about a number of reservations amongst data consumers with regard to the datasets' quality. Quality assessment requires significant effort and consideration, including the definition of data quality metrics and a process to assess datasets based on these definitions. Luzzu is a quality assessment framework for linked data that allows domain-specific metrics to be plugged in. LQML offers notations, abstractions and expressive power, focusing on the representation of quality metrics. It provides expressive power for defining sophisticated quality metrics. Its integration with Luzzu enables their efficient processing and execution and thus the comprehensive assessment of extremely large datasets in a streaming way. We also describe a novel ontology that enables the reuse, sharing and querying of such definitions. Finally, we evaluate the proposed DSL against the cognitive dimensions of notation framework.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.