Paper detail

LS-category and topological complexity of Milnor manifolds and corresponding generalized projective product spaces

Milnor manifolds are a class of certain codimension-$1$ submanifolds of the product of projective spaces. In this paper, we study the LS-category and topological complexity of these manifolds. We determine the exact value of the LS-category and in many cases, the topological complexity of these manifolds. We also obtain tight bounds on the topological complexity of these manifolds. It is known that Milnor manifolds admit $\mathbb{Z}_2$ and circle actions. We compute bounds on the equivariant LS-category and equivariant topological complexity of these manifolds. Finally, we describe the mod-$2$ cohomology rings of some generalized projective product spaces corresponding to Milnor manifolds and use this information to compute the bound on LS-category and topological complexity of these spaces.

preprint2024arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.