Paper detail

Lower threshold ground state energy and testability of minimal balanced cut density

Lovász and his coauthors defined the notion of microcanonical ground state energy $\hat{\mathcal{E}}_\mathbb{a} (G,J)$ -- borrowed from the statistical physics -- for weighted graphs $G$, where $\mathbb{a}$ is a probability distribution on $\{1,...,q\}$ and $J$ is a symmetric $q \times q$ matrix with real entries. We define a new version of the ground state energy, $\hat{\mathcal{E}}^c (G,J)=\inf_{\mathbb{a}\in A_c}\hat{\mathcal{E}}_\mathbb{a} (G,J)$, called lower threshold ground state energy, where $A_c = \{\mathbb{a} :\, a_i\ge c,\,i=1,\dots, q \}$. Both types of energies can be extended for graphons $W$, the limit objects of convergent sequences of simple graphs. In the main result of the paper it is stated that if $0\leq c_1<c_2 \leq 1$, then the convergence of the sequences $(\hat{\mathcal{E}}^{c_2/q} (G_n,J))$ for each $J$ implies convergence of the sequences $(\hat{\mathcal{E}}^{c_1/q} (G_n,J))$ for each $J$. As a byproduct one can derive in a natural way the testability of minimum balanced multiway cut densities, that is one of the fundamental problems of cluster analysis.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.