Paper detail

Lower bounds for Gromov width of coadjoint orbits in U(n)

We use the Gelfand-Tsetlin pattern to construct an effective Hamiltonian, completely integrable action of a torus T on an open dense subset of a coadjoint orbit of the unitary group. We then identify a proper Hamiltonian T-manifold centered around a point in the dual of the Lie algebra of T. A theorem of Karshon and Tolman says that such a manifold is equivariantly symplectomorphic to a particular subset of R^2D. This fact enables us to construct symplectic embeddings of balls into certain coadjoint orbits of the unitary group, and therefore obtain a lower bound for their Gromov width. Using the identification of the dual of the Lie algebra of the unitary group with the space of (n x n) Hermitian matrices, the main theorem states that for a coadjoint orbit through λ=diag(λ_1, ..., λ_n) in the dual of the Lie algebra of the unitary group, where at most one eigenvalue is repeated, the lower bound for Gromov width is equal to the minimum of the differences λ_i-λ_j, over all λ_i>λ_j. For a generic orbit (i.e. with distinct λ_i's), with additional integrality conditions, this minimum has been proved to be exactly the Gromov width of the orbit. For nongeneric orbits this lower bound is new.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.