Paper detail

Lower Bounds and a Near-Optimal Shrinkage Estimator for Least Squares using Random Projections

In this work, we consider the deterministic optimization using random projections as a statistical estimation problem, where the squared distance between the predictions from the estimator and the true solution is the error metric. In approximately solving a large scale least squares problem using Gaussian sketches, we show that the sketched solution has a conditional Gaussian distribution with the true solution as its mean. Firstly, tight worst case error lower bounds with explicit constants are derived for any estimator using the Gaussian sketch, and the classical sketching is shown to be the optimal unbiased estimator. For biased estimators, the lower bound also incorporates prior knowledge about the true solution. Secondly, we use the James-Stein estimator to derive an improved estimator for the least squares solution using the Gaussian sketch. An upper bound on the expected error of this estimator is derived, which is smaller than the error of the classical Gaussian sketch solution for any given data. The upper and lower bounds match when the SNR of the true solution is known to be small and the data matrix is well conditioned. Empirically, this estimator achieves smaller error on simulated and real datasets, and works for other common sketching methods as well.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.