Paper detail

Lower and Upper Bounds for Numbers of Linear Regions of Graph Convolutional Networks

The research for characterizing GNN expressiveness attracts much attention as graph neural networks achieve a champion in the last five years. The number of linear regions has been considered a good measure for the expressivity of neural networks with piecewise linear activation. In this paper, we present some estimates for the number of linear regions of the classic graph convolutional networks (GCNs) with one layer and multiple-layer scenarios. In particular, we obtain an optimal upper bound for the maximum number of linear regions for one-layer GCNs, and the upper and lower bounds for multi-layer GCNs. The simulated estimate shows that the true maximum number of linear regions is possibly closer to our estimated lower bound. These results imply that the number of linear regions of multi-layer GCNs is exponentially greater than one-layer GCNs per parameter in general. This suggests that deeper GCNs have more expressivity than shallow GCNs.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.