Paper detail

Low Rank Approximation with Entrywise $\ell_1$-Norm Error

We study the $\ell_1$-low rank approximation problem, where for a given $n \times d$ matrix $A$ and approximation factor $α\geq 1$, the goal is to output a rank-$k$ matrix $\widehat{A}$ for which $$\|A-\widehat{A}\|_1 \leq α\cdot \min_{\textrm{rank-}k\textrm{ matrices}~A&#39;}\|A-A&#39;\|_1,$$ where for an $n \times d$ matrix $C$, we let $\|C\|_1 = \sum_{i=1}^n \sum_{j=1}^d |C_{i,j}|$. This error measure is known to be more robust than the Frobenius norm in the presence of outliers and is indicated in models where Gaussian assumptions on the noise may not apply. The problem was shown to be NP-hard by Gillis and Vavasis and a number of heuristics have been proposed. It was asked in multiple places if there are any approximation algorithms. We give the first provable approximation algorithms for $\ell_1$-low rank approximation, showing that it is possible to achieve approximation factor $α= (\log d) \cdot \mathrm{poly}(k)$ in $\mathrm{nnz}(A) + (n+d) \mathrm{poly}(k)$ time, where $\mathrm{nnz}(A)$ denotes the number of non-zero entries of $A$. If $k$ is constant, we further improve the approximation ratio to $O(1)$ with a $\mathrm{poly}(nd)$-time algorithm. Under the Exponential Time Hypothesis, we show there is no $\mathrm{poly}(nd)$-time algorithm achieving a $(1+\frac{1}{\log^{1+γ}(nd)})$-approximation, for $γ> 0$ an arbitrarily small constant, even when $k = 1$. We give a number of additional results for $\ell_1$-low rank approximation: nearly tight upper and lower bounds for column subset selection, CUR decompositions, extensions to low rank approximation with respect to $\ell_p$-norms for $1 \leq p < 2$ and earthmover distance, low-communication distributed protocols and low-memory streaming algorithms, algorithms with limited randomness, and bicriteria algorithms. We also give a preliminary empirical evaluation.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.