Paper detail

Low-energy scales and temperature-dependent photoemission of heavy fermions

We solve the $S=1/2$ Kondo lattice model within the dynamical mean field theory. Detailed predictions are made for the dependence of the lattice Kondo resonance and the conduction electron spectral density on temperature and band filling $n_{c}$. Two low-energy scales are identified in the spectra: a renormalized hybridization pseudogap scale $T^{*}$, which correlates with the single-ion Kondo scale, and a lattice Kondo scale $T_{0} < T^{*}$, which acts as the Fermi-liquid coherence scale. The lattice Kondo resonance is split into a main branch, which is pinned at the Fermi level, and whose width is set by $T_{0}$, and an upper branch at $ω\approx T^{*}$. The weight of the upper branch decreases rapidly away from $n_{c}=1$ and vanishes for $n_{c}\lesssim 0.7$. In contrast, the pseudogap in the conduction electron spectral density persists for all $n_{c}$. On increasing temperature, the lattice Kondo resonance at the Fermi level vanishes on a temperature scale of order $10 T_{0}$, as in impurity model calculations. In contrast to impurity model spectra, however, the position of the lattice Kondo resonance depends strongly on temperature, particularly close to the Kondo insulating state. The results are used to make predictions on the temperature dependence of the low-energy photoemission and inverse photoemission spectra of metallic heavy fermions and doped Kondo insulators. We compare our results with available high-resolution measurements on YbInCu$_4$ and YbAgCu$_4$. The loss in intensity with increasing temperature, and the asymmetric lineshape of the low-energy spectra are well accounted for by our model. More detailed agreement with experiment would require including the $f$-orbital degeneracy and crystal-field excited states.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.