Paper detail

Lossless Compression and Complexity of Chaotic Sequences

We investigate the complexity of short symbolic sequences of chaotic dynamical systems by using lossless compression algorithms. In particular, we study Non-Sequential Recursive Pair Substitution (NSRPS), a lossless compression algorithm first proposed by W. Ebeling et al. [Math. Biosc. 52, 1980] and Jiménez-Montaño et al. [arXiv:cond-mat/0204134, 2002]) which was subsequently shown to be optimal. NSPRS has also been used to estimate Entropy of written English (P. Grassberger [arXiv:physics/0207023, 2002]). We propose a new measure of complexity - defined as the number of iterations of NSRPS required to transform the input sequence into a constant sequence. We test this measure on symbolic sequences of the Logistic map for various values of the bifurcation parameter. The proposed measure of complexity is easy to compute and is observed to be highly correlated with the Lyapunov exponent of the original non-linear time series, even for very short symbolic sequences (as short as 50 samples). Finally, we construct symbolic sequences from the Skew-Tent map which are incompressible by popular compression algorithms like WinZip, WinRAR and 7-Zip, but compressible by NSRPS.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.