Paper detail

Lorentz violation effects in two neutrino double-beta decay

Observable effects for the Lorentz invariance violation (LIV) at a low energy scale can also be investigated in double beta decay (DBD). For example, by comparing the theoretical predictions with a precise analysis of the summed energy spectra of electrons in $2νββ$ decay, one can constrain the $\mathring{a}_{of}^{(3)}$ coefficient that governs the time-like component of the Lorentz invariance violating operator that appears in the Standard Model extension theory. In this work, we perform calculations of the phase space factors and summed energy spectra of electrons as well as of their deviations due to LIV necessary in such experimental investigations. The Fermi functions needed in the calculation are built up with exact electron wave functions obtained by numerically solving the Dirac equation in a realistic Coulomb-type potential with the inclusion of the finite nuclear size and screening effects. We compared our results with those used in previous LIV investigations that were obtained with approximate (analytical) Fermi functions and found differences of up to $30\%$ for heavier nuclei. Our work includes eight experimentally interesting nuclei. Next, we estimate and discuss the uncertainties of our calculations associated with uncertainties in Q-values measurements and the differences raised from the inclusion of the kinematic terms in the formalism. Finally, we provide the ratio between the standard phase space factors and their LIV deviations and the energies where the LIV effects are expected to be maximal. We expect our study to be useful in the current LIV investigations in $2νββ$ decay and to lead to improved constraints on the $\mathring{a}_{of}^{(3)}$ coefficient.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.