Paper detail

Logarithmic improvements in the Weyl law and exponential bounds on the number of closed geodesics are predominant

Let $M$ be a smooth compact manifold of dimension $d$ without boundary. We introduce the concept of predominance for Riemannian metrics on $M$, a notion analogous to full Lebesgue measure which, in particular, implies density. We show that for a predominant metric, the number of closed geodesics of length smaller than $T$ has a stretched exponential upper bound in $T$. In addition, we study remainders in the Weyl law for predominant metrics. The Weyl law states that the number of Laplace-Beltrami eigenvalues smaller than $λ^2$ is asymptotic to $Cλ^d$ with an $O(λ^{d-1})$ error. We show that, for a predominant metric, the estimate on the error can by improved by a power of $\log λ$. After an application of recent results of the authors in the case of the Weyl law, these estimates follow from a study of the non-degeneracy properties of nearly closed orbits for predominant sets of metrics.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors6 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.