Paper detail

Logarithmic Expansions and the Stability of Periodic Patterns of Localized Spots for Reaction-Diffusion Systems in $\R^2

The linear stability of steady-state periodic patterns of localized spots in $\R^2$ for the two-component Gierer-Meinhardt (GM) and Schnakenburg reaction-diffusion models is analyzed in the semi-strong interaction limit corresponding to an asymptotically small diffusion coefficient $\eps^2$ of the activator concentration. In the limit $\eps\to 0$, localized spots in the activator are centered at the lattice points of a Bravais lattice with constant area $|Ω|$. To leading order in $ν={-1/\log\eps}$, the linearization of the steady-state periodic spot pattern has a zero eigenvalue when the inhibitor diffusivity satisfies $D={D_0/ν}$, for some $D_0$ independent of the lattice and the Bloch wavevector $\kb$. From a combination of the method of matched asymptotic expansions, Floquet-Bloch theory, and the rigorous study of certain nonlocal eigenvalue problems, an explicit analytical formula for the continuous band of spectrum that lies within an ${\mathcal O}(ν)$ neighborhood of the origin in the spectral plane is derived when $D={D_0/ν} + D_1$, where $D_1={\mathcal O}(1)$ is a de-tuning parameter. The periodic pattern is linearly stable when $D_1$ is chosen small enough so that this continuous band is in the stable left-half plane $\mbox{Re}(λ)<0$ for all $\kb$. Moreover, for both the Schnakenburg and GM models, our analysis identifies a model-dependent objective function, involving the regular part of the Bloch Green's function, that must be maximized in order to determine the specific periodic arrangement of localized spots that constitutes a linearly stable steady-state pattern for the largest value of $D$. From a numerical computation, it is shown within the class of oblique Bravais lattices that a regular hexagonal lattice arrangement of spots is optimal for maximizing the stability threshold in $D$.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.