Paper detail

Lithium transport through Lithium-ion battery cathode coatings

The surface coating of cathodes using insulator films has proven to be a promising method for high-voltage cathode stabilization in Li-ion batteries. However, there is still substantial uncertainty about how these films function, specifically with regard to important coating design principles such as lithium solubility and transport through the films. This study uses Density Functional Theory to examine the diffusivity of interstitial lithium in crystalline α-$AlF_3$, α-$Al_2O_3$, m-$ZrO_2$, c-MgO, and α-quartz $SiO_2$, which provide benchmark cases for further understanding of insulator coatings in general. In addition, we propose an Ohmic electrolyte model to predict resistivities and overpotential contributions under battery operating conditions. For the crystalline materials considered we predict that Li+ diffuses quite slowly, with a migration barrier larger than 0.9 eV in all crystalline materials except α-quartz $SiO_2$, which is predicted to have a migration barrier of 0.276 eV along <001>. These results suggest that the stable crystalline forms of these insulator materials, except for oriented α-quartz $SiO_2$, are not practical for conformal cathode coatings. Amorphous $Al_2O_3$ and $AlF_3$ have higher Li+ diffusivities than their crystalline counterparts. Our predicted amorphous $Al_2O_3$ resistivity (1789 MΩm) is near the top of the range of fitted resistivities extracted from previous experiments on nominal $Al_2O_3$ coatings (7.8 to 913 MΩm) while our predicted amorphous $AlF_3$ resistivity (114 MΩm) is close to the middle of the range. These comparisons support our framework for modeling and understanding the impact on overpotential of conformal coatings in terms of their fundamental thermodynamic and kinetic properties, and support that these materials can provide practical conformal coatings in their amorphous form.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.