Paper detail

List-Decodable Subspace Recovery: Dimension Independent Error in Polynomial Time

In list-decodable subspace recovery, the input is a collection of $n$ points $αn$ (for some $α\ll 1/2$) of which are drawn i.i.d. from a distribution $\mathcal{D}$ with a isotropic rank $r$ covariance $Π_*$ (the \emph{inliers}) and the rest are arbitrary, potential adversarial outliers. The goal is to recover a $O(1/α)$ size list of candidate covariances that contains a $\hatΠ$ close to $Π_*$. Two recent independent works (Raghavendra-Yau, Bakshi-Kothari 2020) gave the first efficient algorithm for this problem. These results, however, obtain an error that grows with the dimension (linearly in [RY] and logarithmically in BK) at the cost of quasi-polynomial running time) and rely on \emph{certifiable anti-concentration} - a relatively strict condition satisfied essentially only by the Gaussian distribution. In this work, we improve on these results on all three fronts: \emph{dimension-independent} error via a faster fixed-polynomial running time under less restrictive distributional assumptions. Specifically, we give a $poly(1/α) d^{O(1)}$ time algorithm that outputs a list containing a $\hatΠ$ satisfying $\|\hatΠ -Π_*\|_F \leq O(1/α)$. Our result only needs $\mathcal{D}$ to have \emph{certifiably hypercontractive} degree 2 polynomials. As a result, in addition to Gaussians, our algorithm applies to the uniform distribution on the hypercube and $q$-ary cubes and arbitrary product distributions with subgaussian marginals. Prior work (Raghavendra and Yau, 2020) had identified such distributions as potential hard examples as such distributions do not exhibit strong enough anti-concentration. When $\mathcal{D}$ satisfies certifiable anti-concentration, we obtain a stronger error guarantee of $\|\hatΠ-Π_*\|_F \leq η$ for any arbitrary $η> 0$ in $d^{O(poly(1/α) + \log (1/η))}$ time.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.