Paper detail

Liquid-Gas Asymmetry and the Wavevector-Dependent Surface Tension

Attempts to extend the capillary-wave theory of fluid interfacial fluctuations to microscopic wavelengths, by introducing an effective wave-vector ($q$) dependent surface tension $σ_\text{eff}(q)$, have encountered difficulties. There is no consensus as to even the shape of $σ_\text{eff}(q)$. By analysing a simple density functional model of the liquid-gas interface, we identify different schemes for separating microscopic observables into background and interfacial contributions. In order for the backgrounds of the density-density correlation function and local structure factor to have a consistent and physically meaningful interpretation in terms of weighted bulk gas and liquid contributions, the background of the total structure factor must be characterised by a microscopic $q$-dependent length $ζ(q)$ not identified previously. The necessity of including the $q$ dependence of $ζ(q)$ is illustrated explicitly in our model and has wider implications, i.e. in typical experimental and simulation studies, an indeterminacy in $ζ(q)$ will always be present, reminiscent of the cut-off used in capillary-wave theory. This leads inevitably to a large uncertainty in the $q$ dependence of $σ_\text{eff}(q)$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.