Paper detail

Linear bounds on treewidth in terms of excluded planar minors

One of the fundamental results in graph minor theory is that for every planar graph $H$, there is a minimum integer $f(H)$ such that graphs with no minor isomorphic to $H$ have treewidth at most $f(H)$. A lower bound for ${f(H)}$ can be obtained by considering the maximum integer $k$ such that $H$ contains $k$ vertex-disjoint cycles. There exists a graph of treewidth ${Ω(k\log k)}$ which does not contain $k$ vertex-disjoint cycles, from which it follows that ${f(H) = Ω(k\log k)}$. In particular, if ${f(H)}$ is linear in ${\lvert{V(H)}\rvert}$ for graphs $H$ from a subclass of planar graphs, it is necessary that $n$-vertex graphs from the class contain at most ${O(n/\log(n))}$ vertex-disjoint cycles. We ask whether this is also a sufficient condition, and demonstrate that this is true for classes of planar graphs with bounded component size. For an $n$-vertex graph $H$ which is a disjoint union of $r$ cycles, we show that ${f(H) \leq 3n/2 + O(r^2 \log r)}$, and improve this to ${f(H) \leq n + O(\sqrt{n})}$ when ${r = 2}$. In particular this bound is linear when ${r=O(\sqrt{n}/\log(n))}$. We present a linear bound for ${f(H)}$ when $H$ is a subdivision of an $r$-edge planar graph for any constant $r$. We also improve the best known bounds for ${f(H)}$ when $H$ is the wheel graph or the ${4 \times 4}$ grid, obtaining a bound of $160$ for the latter.

preprint2024arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.