Paper detail

Limiting aspects of non-convex ${TV}^ϕ$ models

Recently, non-convex regularisation models have been introduced in order to provide a better prior for gradient distributions in real images. They are based on using concave energies $ϕ$ in the total variation type functional ${TV}^ϕ(u) := \int ϕ(|\nabla u(x)|) d x$. In this paper, it is demonstrated that for typical choices of $ϕ$, functionals of this type pose several difficulties when extended to the entire space of functions of bounded variation, ${BV}(Ω)$. In particular, if $ϕ(t)=t^q$ for $q \in (0, 1)$ and ${TV}^ϕ$ is defined directly for piecewise constant functions and extended via weak* lower semicontinuous envelopes to ${BV}(Ω)$, then still ${TV}^ϕ(u)=\infty$ for $u$ not piecewise constant. If, on the other hand, ${TV}^ϕ$ is defined analogously via continuously differentiable functions, then ${TV}^ϕ\equiv 0$, (!). We study a way to remedy the models through additional multiscale regularisation and area strict convergence, provided that the energy $ϕ(t)=t^q$ is linearised for high values. The fact, that this kind of energies actually better matches reality and improves reconstructions, is demonstrated by statistics and numerical experiments.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.