Paper detail

Limited Range Fractality of Randomly Adsorbed Rods

Multiple resolution analysis of two dimensional structures composed of randomly adsorbed penetrable rods, for densities below the percolation threshold, has been carried out using box-counting functions. It is found that at relevant resolutions, for box-sizes, $r$, between cutoffs given by the average rod length $<\ell>$ and the average inter-rod distance $r_1$, these systems exhibit apparent fractal behavior. It is shown that unlike the case of randomly distributed isotropic objects, the upper cutoff $r_1$ is not only a function of the coverage but also depends on the excluded volume, averaged over the orientational distribution. Moreover, the apparent fractal dimension also depends on the orientational distributions of the rods and decreases as it becomes more anisotropic. For box sizes smaller than $<\ell>$ the box counting function is determined by the internal structure of the rods, whether simple or itself fractal. Two examples are considered - one of regular rods of one dimensional structure and rods which are trimmed into a Cantor set structure which are fractals themselves. The models examined are relevant to adsorption of linear molecules and fibers, liquid crystals, stress induced fractures and edge imperfections in metal catalysts. We thus obtain a distinction between two ranges of length scales: $r < <\ell>$ where the internal structure of the adsorbed objects is probed, and $<\ell> < r < r_1$ where their distribution is probed, both of which may exhibit fractal behavior. This distinction is relevant to the large class of systems which exhibit aggregation of a finite density of fractal-like clusters, which includes surface growth in molecular beam epitaxy and diffusion-limited-cluster-cluster-aggregation models.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.