Paper detail

Limit theories and continuous orbifolds

Relativistic QFTs are in general defined by a collection of effective actions, describing the dynamics of quantum fields at different energy scales. The consequent natural idea of a space of theories is still a rather imprecise notion, since a detailed knowledge or a classification of QFTs is out of reach. In two dimensions the situation is in a better shape: in this context CFTs are under control in many instances, and we know sequences of rational theories emerging as end-points of RG flows. The present thesis explores the behaviour of sequences of rational two-dimensional CFTs when the central charge approaches its supremum. After a review of various notions useful to study limit theories, like the concept of averaged fields and the construction of continuous orbifolds, we analyse in detail the limit of sequences of N=2 supersymmetric CFTs that are connected by RG flows. The limit is not unique, since with extended Virasoro symmetry one can choose different scalings for the labels of the spectrum in the limit. We construct explicitly two c=3 CFTs emerging as the large level limit of minimal models, and we identify both of them: one is the N=2 CFT of two uncompactified free real bosons and two free real fermions, the other is its continuous orbifold by U(1). We compare spectrum, torus partition function, correlators and boundary conditions. The neatest interpretation of this result is given by studying the realisation of N=2 minimal models as gauged WZW models: taking the two different limits amounts to zooming into two different regions of the target-space geometry. At the end we speculate about possible extensions and generalisations.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.