Paper detail

Likelihood Scores for Sparse Signal and Change-Point Detection

We consider here the identification of change-points on large-scale data streams. The objective is to find the most efficient way of combining information across data stream so that detection is possible under the smallest detectable change magnitude. The challenge comes from the sparsity of change-points when only a small fraction of data streams undergo change at any point in time. The most successful approach to the sparsity issue so far has been the application of hard thresholding such that only local scores from data streams exhibiting significant changes are considered and added. However the identification of an optimal threshold is a difficult one. In particular it is unlikely that the same threshold is optimal for different levels of sparsity. We propose here a sparse likelihood score for identifying a sparse signal. The score is a likelihood ratio for testing between the null hypothesis of no change against an alternative hypothesis in which the change-points or signals are barely detectable. By the Neyman-Pearson Lemma this score has maximum detection power at the given alternative. The outcome is that we have a scoring of data streams that is successful in detecting at the boundary of the detectable region of signals and change-points. The likelihood score can be seen as a soft thresholding approach to sparse signal and change-point detection in which local scores that indicate small changes are down-weighted much more than local scores indicating large changes. We are able to show second-order optimality of the sparsity likelihood score in the sense of achieving successful detection at the minimum detectable order of change magnitude as well as at the minimum detection asymptotic constant with respect this order of change.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.