Paper detail

Likelihood ratio tests for positivity in polynomial regressions

A polynomial that is nonnegative over a given interval is called a positive polynomial. The set of such positive polynomials forms a closed convex cone $K$. In this paper, we consider the likelihood ratio test for the hypothesis of positivity that the estimand polynomial regression curve is a positive polynomial. By considering hierarchical hypotheses including the hypothesis of positivity, we define nested likelihood ratio tests, and derive their null distributions as mixtures of chi-square distributions by using the volume-of-tubes method. The mixing probabilities are obtained by utilizing the parameterizations for the cone $K$ and its dual provided in the framework of Tchebycheff systems for polynomials of degree at most 4. For polynomials of degree greater than 4, the upper and lower bounds for the null distributions are provided. Moreover, we propose associated simultaneous confidence bounds for polynomial regression curves. Regarding computation, we demonstrate that symmetric cone programming is useful to obtain the test statistics. As an illustrative example, we conduct data analysis on growth curves of two groups. We examine the hypothesis that the growth rate (the derivative of growth curve) of one group is always higher than the other.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.