Paper detail

Likelihood-based tests on linear hypotheses of large dimensional mean vectors with unequal covariance matrices

This paper considers testing linear hypotheses of a set of mean vectors with unequal covariance matrices in large dimensional setting. The problem of testing the hypothesis $H_0 : \sum_{i=1}^q β_i \bmu_i =\bmu_0 $ for a given vector $\bmu_0$ is studied from the view of likelihood, which makes the proposed tests more powerful. We use the CLT for linear spectral statistics of a large dimensional $F$-matrix in Zheng(2012) [21] to establish the new test statistics in large dimensional framework, so that the proposed tests can be applicable for large dimensional non-Gaussian variables in a wider range. Furthermore, our new tests provide more optimal empirical powers due to the likelihood-based statistics, meanwhile their empirical sizes are closer to the significant level. Finally, the simulation study is provided to compare the proposed tests with other high dimensional mean vectors tests for evaluation of their performances.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.